How (and Why . . . ) Coaching Really Works

I’m going to let you in on a bit of a secret. You have to promise not to tell the ICF that I told you this or I could get in really big trouble. Deal?

Coaching works for three reasons (and they don’t all jibe with what the ICF says on their web-site):

One, because the client steps up and makes a financial, time and energy commitment to the coaching process. Just this is about 30% of why coaching works. But without a coach to effectively market themselves and enroll the client, this never happens. So, the coach is still incredibly vital, even in this step/component.

The second reason is regular coaching sessions and the accountability that comes from knowing that you (the client) will be talking with your coach soon. This aspect is inextricably linked — and thusly powerful — with the financial commitment (especially if you’ve pre-paid your sessions (whether they are refundable or not . . . )). I would estimate the weight of this component is 30%

Thirdly, the final 40% is the skill and knowledge of the coach. A coach expert in the various skills of coaching (such as: listening, questioning, generating awareness, designing actions, planning and goal-setting and challenging) will bring tremendous value to the client, and their future. But even a client with an average coach will generate good results if the first two pieces are in place.

Take away the coach from any of the above and there’s no coaching — and no change and/or improvement for the client. But, by hiring a coach, and working with them on a regular basis, there is so much good that can/will result.

Looking at the percentages, just showing up on a regular basis, gets you a passing grade (60%). An okay coach gets you another 10%, which is a C, 10 percentage points more gets you to 80 and a B and an excellent, energized and engaged coach is going to get you to 90% and above.

To put all the numbers in perspective, imagine the best anyone in society — or in your workplace — can do without some form of coaching (or consistent, disciplined self-improvement — and this is exceedingly rare) is get a D, but someone who takes the initiative and invests in themselves and their future by hiring a coach can earn anywhere from a C to an A+, and we have a very strong case for coaching.

And one final note: it is pretty easy to identify and not-hire a “D” or “C” coach. When you’re doing your due diligence in selecting a coach, and you’ve asked for testimonials/referrals, examined education, experience and qualifications and interviewed at least three coaches, it’s easy to know 1) who is a decent-to-excellent coach and 2) which coach is a good fit for you personality-wise.

Similar Posts

  • What Is Success?

    Success is a skill. It’s not something we arrive at, or get, or have bestowed upon us or finally possess. It’s something that must be developed, over time, and continually re-made and renewed. It’s what we choose to think. It’s how we choose to think. Are we choosing useful and constructive thoughts? Are we meditating and…

  • It’s About The Soil

    While watching Carol Leifer on the Tavis Smiley Show talk about how she kept trying, and trying, and trying to get on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson I had a realization. Tavis was asking how do you keep going when you keep getting rejected (it took her 22 auditions to finally get booked)? Carol…

  • It’s All About Focus

    Be thankful for what you have; you’ll end up having more. If you concentrate on what you don’t have, you will never, ever have enough. – Oprah Winfrey What you focus on is everything. Imagine your “focus” is a steering wheel in a car. Where you steer towards is what you get. Of course, sometimes…

  • Fate or Choice?

    Are our lives the result of fate or do we choose our lives? Are we consigned to what our circumstances (/our pasts) allow for in the unfolding of our lives, or can we create our lives, can we be willful? I just watched an interesting video from Marshall Goldsmith that offers a (hybrid) answer: Yes. I…

  • Kant Had it Backwards

    “‎The ‘I think’ which Kant said must be able to accompany all my objects, is the ‘I breathe’ which actually does accompany them.” – William James I have long thought that Kant had it wrong when he said “I think, therefore I am.” Sometime not long after my Intro to Philosophy course at Hobart College…